Evaluation of the Antinutrients, Amino Acid Profile and Physicochemical Properties of Hura crepitan Seed

Main Article Content

E. C. Nwokenkwo
J. N. Nwosu
N. C. Onuegbu
I. A. Olawuni
A. F. Ofoedum

Abstract

The Objectives of the Study: To evaluate the Antinutritional components, Amino acid profiles and the physic-chemical properties of Hura crepitan (Sand box) seed.

Design of the Study: This study was structured to fit into using a combination of T-test and one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to evaluate the data obtained from the laboratory analysis.

Place and Duration of Study: This research work was done at the Department of Food Science and Technology Laboratory, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria, between May 2019 and November 2019.

Methods: The mature dry fruits of the Hura crepitan seeds were harvested from the plants on Federal University of Technology Owerri, Imo State campus.

The Hura crepitan seeds were sorted in order to remove dirts and foreign other foreign contaminants. The cleaned seeds were divided into four portions and stored in separate glass containers for further processing. The first portion of the seeds were dried at 60°C in Gallen Kamp moisture extraction oven for 6 hours at and pulverised in a Monilex blended into flour, some seeds were boiled while some portions were roasted and processed into fine flour and subsequently subjected to analysis to evaluate the antinutritional contents, amino acid s as well as determining the physic-chemical properties of the samples.

Results: The results obtained suggested that the anti-nutrients in the raw seed-flour were flavonoids with 17.50%, alkaloid (6.20%), tannin (5.24%), and cyanogenic glycoside (1.76%). Fermentation and moist cooking were found to be more effective in the reduction of the anti-nutrients in the Hura crepitan seeds. The amino acid profiles were evaluated, and twenty amino acids were identified in the seed flour. The three major ones implicated were arginine (3.25 g/100 g in cooked and 8.05 g/100 g in fermented), glutamic acid (6.05 g/100 g in cooked and 10.2 g/100 g in fermented) and valine (8.03 g/100 g in raw and 8.58 g/100 g in fermented). The limiting amino acid is methionine with a chemical score of 44.52%. the physicochemical properties of the sandbox seeds evaluated suggested that the free fatty acids values ranged from 3.60% to 6.03% and there were no significant differences (P>0.05) among the samples, the iodine value ranged from 104.94% to 126.90%, the peroxide value for the sample varies between 2.96% to 44.81%.

Conclusion: This study suggested that the Hura crepitan seed contains appreciable amounts of essential amino acids as well as having good physicochemical properties while the use of moist heat and/or fermentation can reduce the antinutritional components to the bearest minimum. Hence, can be utilized some areas of food industries where protein (amino acids) are critically required.

Keywords:
Sandbox seed, anti-nutrients, amino acids, physicochemical properties, cooking, fermentation

Article Details

How to Cite
Nwokenkwo, E. C., Nwosu, J. N., Onuegbu, N. C., Olawuni, I. A., & Ofoedum, A. F. (2020). Evaluation of the Antinutrients, Amino Acid Profile and Physicochemical Properties of Hura crepitan Seed. Archives of Current Research International, 20(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2020/v20i530192
Section
Original Research Article

References

PIER. Pacific Island Ecosystems at Risk; 2005.

Available:http:/www.hear.org/pier/species/hura crepitans.htm

Adewale A, Awolade PO, Oderinde RA. Hura crepitan seed oil: An alternative Feed stock for Biodiesel production. Journal of Fuel. 2014;16.

ID 464590

Jones DE. Poison Arrows: North American Indian Hunting and Warfare. University of Texas Press; 2007.

Charles CD, Maribeth L, Daniel LN, Kenneth JW, David AB. Floral gigantism in Rafflesiaceae. Science Express; 2007.

Day RA Jr, Underwood AL. Quantitative Analysis 5th Edn. Prentice-Hall Englewood N.J. 1986;33.

Schroeder WA, Kay LM, Mills RS. Anal. Chem. John Wiles & Sons Ltd. London, U.K; 1990.

Hamza KFS. Contribution of some non timber forest products (NTFPS) to household food security and income generation. A case of village around mgori forest in singids, Tanzania; 2002.

Price ML, Buttler LG. Rapid visual estimation and spectrometric determination of tannin content of sorghum grain. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry. 1977;25: 1268–1273.

Bruin Y. Testing methods and toxicity assessment including alternative. Academic Press Elsevier. 2009;497-514.

Okwu DE. Phytochemical Vitamins and Mineral contents of two Nigerian Medicinal Plants. International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advance Sciences. 2005; 1(4):375–381.

Slinkard K, Singleton VL. Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. AM. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977;28:49-55.

Thomson BD, Erdman JW. Phytic acid determination in soybeans. Journal of Food Science. 1982;47:513– 517.

AOAC. Official Method of Analysis.15th edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington D. C., USA; 1990.

Papes F, Surili MJ, Langone JB, Trigo, Arruda P. F.EBS Lett. 2001;488:34 -38.

Lowry RR, Tinsley LJ. Spectrophotometric determination of fatty acids in oil and oil product. Journal of the American Oil. Chem Sec. 1978;53:470.

Oladele Ebun-Oluwa P, Oshodi Aladesanmi A. Effect of fermentation on some chemical and Nutritive properties of Berlandier Nettle Spurge (Jatropha Cathartica) and physic Nut (Jatropha Curcas) seeds Parkistan Journal of Nuritional. 2013;7(2):292- 296.

Inuwa HM, Aina VO, Gabi B, Aimola I, Toyin A. A comparative determination of anti-nutritional factors in groundnut oil and palm oil. Advanced Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;34:275– 279.

Bolhuis GG. The toxicity of cassava roots. Nesh, J. Agric. Science. 2003;2(3):176-185.

Omafuvbe BO, Abiose SH, Shounkan OO. Fermentation of soya-bean (Glycine max) for soy daddawa production by starter cultures of Bacillus. Food Microbiology. 2000;19:561-566.

FAO/WHO/UNU. Protein quality evaluation. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nation Rome; Italy. 1991;3-8

Kyari MZ. Extraction and Characterization of seed oils. International Agrophysics. 2008;22:139-142.

Satish I, Shrivastara SK. Amino acid profile of some new variaties of oil seeds. Advanced Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;3(2):111–115.

Nas S, Sheikh H, Saddiqi R, Sayeed SA. Oxidative stability of olive, corn and soya bean oil under different conditions. Food Chemistry. 2003;88:253-259.

Pearson D. Chemical analysis of foods. 7th Edn., Church Hill Livingstone, London, UK. 1986;72–73, 138–143, 488–496.

Obasi NA, Ukadilonu J, Eze E, Akubugwo EI, Okorie UC. Proximate composition extraction, characterization and comparative assessment of coconut (CoCos nucifera) and Melon (Colocyntis citrulus) seeds and seed oils. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences. 2012;15(1): 1–9.

Atasie VN, Akinhanmi TF, Ojiodu CC. Proximate analysis and physic chemical properties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaca L.). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2009; 8(2):194-197.

Akpambang VOE, Amoo IA, Izuagie. Comparative compositional analysis on two varieties of melon (colocynthis citrulles and cucumeropsis) and a variety of almond (prunes amygdalus). Res. J. Agric. Biological Sci. 2008;4:639-642.

Ejikeme PM, Obasi LN, Egbuonu ACC. Physico-chemical and toxicological studies on Afzelia Africana seed and oil. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2010;9(13): 1959-1963.

Abbas Ali M, Sayeed Abu M, Ray Kumar R, Yaesim S, Khan Mohal A. Comparative studies on characteristics of seed oils and nutritional composition of seeds from different varieties of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L) Cultivated in Bangladesh, Asian Y. Biotechnol. 2008;3(4):203-212.

Agatemore C. Studies of selected Physic Chemical properties of fluted pumpkin (Telfaira occidentalis Hook F) seed oil and tropical Almond (Terminalia catappia L.) seed oil. Pakistani J. Nutrition. 2006;5(4): 203-212.

Codex Alimentarius Commission. Recommended International Standard for Edible Fats and Oils Edn. I. FAO/WHO, Rome. 1982;11:1-179.