Farmers Knowledge, Practices and Health Problems Associated with Pesticides Use in West Tripoli, Libya

Main Article Content

Hamza S. Abdalla Lagili
Hesham Ayouz
Serife Gunduz
Ndifreke Etuk Williams
Olusola Bamisile
Onyinyechi Jas Kamalu


Aims: This study focuses on farmers’ knowledge, practices and health problems associated with pesticide use in west Tripoli, Libya.

Study Design: This study concentrated on the farmer being above 18 years, a permanent resident in the study area and the respondent’s willingness obliged to the study protocols and complete the study.

Place and Duration of Study: The study is a cross-sectional one among 300 farmers in the West Tripoli district of the Libya which concentrated on the adult population conducted in 2017.

Methodology: The associations between pesticide-handling practices, knowledge and attitude and factors potentially influencing them were explored by means of t-test, ANOVA and descriptive statistics using the statistical software SPSS 20.0. The reliability of the construct was examined using Cronbach’s alpha which was not below 0.700 indicating excellent internal consistency.

Results: Farmers re-spray the crops with surplus pesticide mixture. They throw away surplus pesticide mixture on uncultivated land wash and reuse emptied pesticide containers to store water. Knowledge associated with pesticide use and practices associated with it was also not statistically significant related to attitudes towards educational level. Awareness of pesticide use and handling and therefore showed that there was no statistically significant difference between a male and female farmers’ awareness of pesticide use and handling. There is no significant relationship between farmer’s monthly income and knowledge regarding pesticide use and there was linear relationship practices with respect to pesticides used and symptoms experienced after exposure to pesticides. Level of education affect farmer’s knowledge and practices associated with pesticide use and the ANOVA, F = 1.489 and p =.000 (> 0.05) suggests that the test was not statistically significant, on how gender affect the awareness of pesticide use and handling the result showed that there was no statistically significant difference (t (298) = -.460, p = .664 > 0.05) between male and female farmers’ awareness of pesticide use and handling. Therefore, male and female gender do not affect the awareness of pesticide use and handling.

Conclusion: The results of farmers practices regarding the use of protective measures and hygiene practices with the potential for exposure to pesticides indicates that farmers use gloves, face mask, respirator and boots. Moreover, the farmers keep their working clothe at home and the spraying methods used are knapsack, hand- held can, and tractor and can be concluded that the danger of exposure increase when farmers disregard safety directives on the correct utilization of pesticides, PPE utilization and using sanitary practices.

Perception, agricultural student, livestock, waste management, education, teaching tools.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lagili, H. S. A., Ayouz, H., Gunduz, S., Williams, N. E., Bamisile, O., & Kamalu, O. J. (2020). Farmers Knowledge, Practices and Health Problems Associated with Pesticides Use in West Tripoli, Libya. Archives of Current Research International, 20(6), 42-57.
Original Research Article


Lorenz AN, Prapamontol T, Narksen W, Srinual N, Barr DB, Riederer AM. Inter J Environ Res Pub Health. 2012;9(9):3365–3383. Available:

Dey NC. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;11:134-140. Available:

Fianko JR. J Environ Prot. 2011;221–230. Available:

Singh B, Gupta MK. Ind J Occup Env Med. 2009;13(3):127-130. Available:

Sam KG, Andrade HH, Pradhan L, Pradhan A, Sones SJ, Rao PGM, Sudhakar C. Int Arc Occup Environ Health. 2007;81(6):787–795. Available:

Christos AD, Ilias GE. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2011;8:1402-1419. Available:

Ntow WJ, Gijzen HJ, Peter K, Pay D. Pest Manag Sci. 2006;62:356–365 Available:

Remoundou K, Brennan M, Hart A, Lynn JF. Hum Ecol Risk Assess” An Inter J. 2013;20(4): 1113-1138. Available:

Ncube NM, Fogo C, Bessler P, Jolly CM, Jolly PE. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2011;66(2):65-74. Available:

Schlosser TC. Master’s thesis Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia; 1999. Available:

Thundiyil JG, Stober J, Besbelli N, Pronczuk J. Bull W H O. 2008;86(3):205–209. Available:

Andreatta SL. Human Org. 1998;57(3):350–358. Available:

Wesseling C, Aragón A, Castillo L, Corriols M, Chaverri F, Elba DLC, Keifer M, Monge P, Partanen TJ, Ruepert C, Berna VJ. Inter J Occup Environ Health. 2001;7(4):287-294. Available:

Damalas C, Telidis GK, Thanos SD. The Sci Tot Environ. 2008;390(23):341–5. Available:

Limantol AM, Bruce EK, Bismark AA, Bernd L. Springer Plus. 2016;5(830):1-38. Available:

Gatto MP, Fioretti M, Fabrizi G, Gherardi M, Strafella E, Santarelli L. “Effects of potential neurotoxic pesticides on hearing loss: A review”. NeuroToxicology. 2014;42:24–32.

Atreya K. Environ Res. 2007;104(2):305–311. Available:

Khan M, Mahmood HZ, Damalas C. Crop Protection. 2015;67:184-190. Available:

Devi PI. Agric Econ Res Rev. 2009;22:263-268. Available:

Akorfa D. Master Thesis. University of Ghana; 2016. Available:

Fraenkel RJ, Wallen EN. How to design and evaluate research in education” (4th ed.). San Francisco: McGraw-Hill; 2000

Gupta PK. Toxicology. 2004;198: 83–90. Available:

Recena MCP, Caldas ED, Pires DX, Pontes ERC. Environ. Res. 2006;102(2):230–236. Available:

Yassin MM, Abu Mourad TA, Safi JM. Occup. Environ. Med. 2002;59:387–394. Available:

Salameh PR, Baldi I, Brochard P, Abi Saleh B. Environ. Res. 2004;94:1–6. Available:

Sosan MB, Akingbohungbe AE. Arch of environ Occup Health. 2009;64(3):185-93. Available:

Subashiny N, Thiruchelvam S. Sabaramuwa Univ J. 2008;8(1):79-89. Available:

Suthep S, Tanasri S, May TK. Inter J Health Sci. 2016;4(1):48-58. Available:

Macfarlane E, Carey R, Keegel T, El-Zaemay S, Fritschi L. Safety and Health at Work. 2013;4(3):136–141. Available:

Sarker MNI, Ahmad MS, Islam MS, Sayed MMMA, Memon NH. Potential food safety risk: extensive use of fluorine containing agrochemical in fruit production. Fluoride. 2020;53(3):1- 22