A Review of Psychosocial Models for the Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Common Psychosocial Instruments

Main Article Content

Kuok Ho Daniel Tang

Abstract

Aims: While the biomechanical factors causing musculoskeletal disorder (MSDs) are well defined, the psychosocial dimension of MSDs is complex and affected by personal, organizational and environmental elements. There is an impetus to understand how psychosocial risk factors contribute to the manifestation of MSDs and systematically present the strengths and constraints of various instruments in assessing psychosocial risk factors.

Study Design: This article critically reviews various models linking psychosocial constructs to MSDs and various instruments for evaluating psychosocial risk factors.

Methodology: This article reviews the most pertinent literature which presents and discusses the connection of psychosocial domains with the development of MSDs as well as the common instruments used for evaluation of psychosocial factors.

Results: It shows an intricate connection between psychosocial and biomechanical aspects compounded by organizational, individual and environmental factors. Psychosocial factors particularly psychological demand, decisional latitude, level of social support and work organization result in stress which produces strain and physiological deterioration hence MSDs. Different psychosocial risk factors have also been found to evoke MSDs in different body parts. Overarching cognitive and psychological aspects consisting of work demands, maneuver margins and work recognition have also been proposed in examining the psychosocial dimension of MSDs. Instruments for measuring psychological constructs are often subjective and rely on personal reflections. Some instruments assess multiple psychosocial factors while other assess specific attributes. There instruments share a common shortcoming of treating risk factors across different workplaces as homogenous.

Conclusion: Refinement of the instruments and development of sector-specific instruments are beneficial for more reliable evaluation of psychosocial risk factors.

Keywords:
Ergonomic, musculoskeletal disorders, organizational, psychosocial, strain, stress.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tang, K. H. D. (2020). A Review of Psychosocial Models for the Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Common Psychosocial Instruments. Archives of Current Research International, 20(7), 9-19. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2020/v20i730207
Section
Review Article

References

Bergh LIV, Hinna S, Leka S, Jain A. Developing a performance indicator for psychosocial risk in the oil and gas industry. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2014;62:98–106. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753513001835

Tang DKH, Md Dawal SZ, Olugu EU. Actual safety performance of the Malaysian offshore oil platforms: Correlations between the leading and lagging indicators. J Safety Res [Internet]. 2018;66:9–19. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437518300045

Hope S, Øverland S, Brun W, Matthiesen SB. Associations between sleep, risk and safety climate: A study of offshore personnel on the Norwegian continental shelf. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2010;48(4):469–77. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753509002173

Nielsen MB, Hetland J, Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S. Longitudinal relationships between workplace bullying and psychological distress. Scand J Work Environ Health [Internet]. 2012;38(1):38–46. Available:http://www.jstor.org/stable/41508862

Mearns K, Yule S. The role of national culture in determining safety performance: Challenges for the global oil and gas industry. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2009;47(6): 777–85. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753508000295

Eid J, Mearns K, Larsson G, Laberg JC, Johnsen BH. Leadership, psychological capital and safety research: Conceptual issues and future research questions. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2012;50(1): 55–61. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753511001482

Nielsen MB, Eid J, Kathry M, Larsson G. Authentic leadership and its relationship with risk perception and safety climate. Leadersh Organ Dev J [Internet]. 2013; 34(4):308–25. Available:https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-07-2011-0065

Christian MS, Bradley JC, Wallace JC, Burke MJ. Workplace safety: A meta-analysis of the roles of person and situation factors. Vol. 94, Journal of Applied Psychology. Christian, Michael S.: Eller College of Management, University of Arizona, Department of Management and Organizations, McClelland Hall, P.O. Box 210108, Tucson, AZ, US, 85721-0108, [email protected]: American Psychological Association. 2009;1103–27.

Nielsen MB, Glasø L, Matthiesen SB, Eid J, Einarsen S. Bullying and risk‐perception as health hazards on oil rigs. Lee RT, Brotheridge CM, editors. J Manag Psychol [Internet]. 2013;28(4):367–83. Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2012-0395

Belenky G, Wesensten NJ, Thorne DR, Thomas ML, Sing HC, Redmond DP, et al. Patterns of performance degradation and restoration during sleep restriction and subsequent recovery: A sleep dose-response study. J Sleep Res [Internet]. 2003;12(1):1–12. Available: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2869.2003.00337.x

Nakata A, Haratani T, Takahashi M, Kawakami N, Arito H, Kobayashi F, et al. Association of Sickness Absence with Poor Sleep and Depressive Symptoms in Shift Workers. Chronobiol Int [Internet]. 2004; 21(6):899–912. Available: https://doi.org/10.1081/CBI-200038104

Edéll-Gustafsson UM, Kritz EIK, Bogren IK. Self-reported sleep quality, strain and health in relation to perceived working conditions in females. Scand J Caring Sci [Internet]. 2002;16(2):179–87. Available:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-6712.2002.00078.x

Bernal D, Campos-Serna J, Tobias A, Vargas-Prada S, Benavides FG, Serra C. Work-related psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders in hospital nurses and nursing aides: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud [Internet]. 2015;52(2):635–48. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020748914002971

Chany A-M, Marras WS, Burr DL. The Effect of Phone Design on Upper Extremity Discomfort and Muscle Fatigue. Hum Factors [Internet]. 2007;49(4):602–18. Available:https://doi.org/10.1518/001872007X215683

Kovacs AH, Sears SF, Saidi AS. Biopsychosocial experiences of adults with congenital heart disease: Review of the literature. Am Heart J [Internet]. 2005; 150(2):193–201. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000287030400537X

Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MAJ, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health [Internet]. 1993;19(5):297–312. Available:http://www.jstor.org/stable/40966152

Bongers PM, Kremer AM, Laak J ter. Are psychosocial factors, risk factors for symptoms and signs of the shoulder, elbow, or hand/wrist?: A review of the epidemiological literature. Am J Ind Med [Internet]. 2002;41(5):315–42. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10050

Rascle N, Irachabal S. Mediators and moderators: Theoretical and method-logical implications in stress and health psychology research. Trav Hum [Internet]. 2001;64(2):97–118. Available:https://www.cairn-int.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=E_TH_642_0097

Douillet P, Schweitzer J-M. MSD, stress; expanding discretion. TUTB Newsl. 2002;19–20.

Aptel M, Aublet-Cuvelier A, Claude Cnockaert J. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Jt Bone Spine [Internet]. 2002;69(6):546–55. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297319X02004505

Karasek RA, Theorell T. The environment, the worker, and illness: psychosocial and physiological linkages. Karasek RA, Theorell T Heal New York; Basic Books. 1990;83–116.

Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, et al. The measurement of effort–reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med [Internet]. 2004;58(8):1483– 99. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953603003514

Karasek RA. Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Adm Sci Q [Internet]. 1979;24(2):285–308. Available:http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392498

Sauter SL, Swanson NG. An ecological model of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. Beyond Biomech Psychosoc Asp Musculoskelet Disord Off Work. 1996;3–21.

Lazarus RS. Emotion and adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.

Eatough EM, Way JD, Chang C-H. Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints. Appl Ergon [Internet]. 2012;43(3):554–63. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687011001268

Lepine JA, Podsakoff NP, Lepine MA. A Meta-Analytic Test of the Challenge Stressor–Hindrance Stressor Framework: An Explanation for Inconsistent Relationships Among Stressors and Performance. Acad Manag J [Internet]. 2005;48(5):764–75. Available:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.18803921

Beehr TA, Jex SM, Stacy BA, Murray MA. Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. J Organ Behav [Internet]. 2000 Jun 1;21(4):391–405. Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200006)21:4%3C391::AID-JOB15%3E3.0.CO

Tang KHD. Safety performance measurement framework for offshore oil and gas platforms in Malaysia. University of Malaya; 2018.

Tang DKH, Leiliabadi F, Olugu EU, Md Dawal SZ binti. Factors affecting safety of processes in the Malaysian oil and gas industry. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2017;92:44–52. Available :http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753516302636

Tang KHD, Md Dawal SZ, Olugu EU. Integrating fuzzy expert system and scoring system for safety performance evaluation of offshore oil and gas platforms in Malaysia. J Loss Prev Process Ind [Internet]. 2018;56:32–45. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423017305867

Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, Aasland MS, Hetland H. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007; 12(1):80.

Hackman JR, Oldham GR. Work redesign. Boston, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1980.

Weiss HM, Cropanzano R. Affective Events Theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In: Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews, Vol 18. US: Elsevier Science/JAI Press; 1996;1–74.

Oldham GR, Hackman JR. How job characteristics theory happened. In: Smith KG, Hitt MA, editors. The Oxford handbook of management theory: The process of theory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.

Wegge J, Dick R van, Fisher GK, West MA, Dawson JF. A Test of Basic Assumptions of Affective Events Theory (AET) in Call Centre Work1. Br J Manag [Internet]. 2006;17(3):237–54. Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00489.x

Linton SJ. Early identification and intervention in the prevention of musculoskeletal pain. Am J Ind Med [Internet]. 2002;41(5):433–42.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10052

Lanfranchi J-B, Duveau A. Explicative models of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD): From biomechanical and psychosocial factors to clinical analysis of ergonomics. Eur Rev Appl Psychol [Internet]. 2008;58(4):201–13. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908808000388

Tang KHD, Md Dawal SZ, Olugu EU. A review of the offshore oil and gas safety indices. Saf Sci [Internet]. 2018;109:344–52. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575351830331X

Johansson H, Arendt-Nilsson L, Bergenheim M, Blair S, Van Dieen J, Djupsjöbacka M, et al. Epilogue: An integrated model for chronic work-related myalgia Brussels Model. Chronic Work Myalgia Neuromuscul Mech behind Work Chronic Muscle Pain Syndr. 2003;291–300.

Gribble PL, Mullin LI, Cothros N, Mattar A. Role of Cocontraction in Arm Movement Accuracy. J Neurophysiol [Internet]. 2003;89(5):2396–405. Available:https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01020.2002

Van Galen GP, de Jong WP. Fitts’ law as the outcome of a dynamic noise filtering model of motor control. Hum Mov Sci [Internet]. 1995;14(4):539–71. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0167945795000273

Van Gemmert AWA, Van Galen GP. Stress, neuromotor noise, and human performance: A theoretical perspective. Vol. 23, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. US: American Psychological Association; 1997;1299–313.

Menzel NN. Psychosocial Factors in Musculoskeletal Disorders. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am [Internet]. 2007;19(2):145–53. Available:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S089958850700007X

Tang KHD, Md. Dawal SZ, Olugu EU. Generating Safety Performance Scores of Offshore Oil and Gas Platforms in Malaysia. Proc One Curtin Int Postgrad Conf. 2018;325–31.

Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RMT, Sarchielli G, Bonfiglioli R, Mattioli S, et al. Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health [Internet]. 2008;82(1):1–12. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6

Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. US: Educational Publishing Foundation. 1998;3:322–55.

Jackson C. The General Health Questionnaire. Occup Med (Chic Ill) [Internet]. 2007;57(1):79. Available:https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kql169

Tang KHD. A comparative overview of the primary Southeast Asian safety and health laws [Internet]. Vol. ahead-of-p, International Journal of Workplace Health Management; 2020. Available:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-10-2019-0132

Gittell JH, Fairfield KM, Bierbaum B, Head W, Jackson R, Kelly M, et al. Impact of Relational Coordination on Quality of Care, Postoperative Pain and Functioning, and Length of Stay: A Nine-Hospital Study of Surgical Patients. Med Care [Internet]. 2000; 38(8). Available:https://journals.lww.com/lww-medicalcare/Fulltext/2000/08000/Impact_of_Relational_Coordination_on_Quality_of.5.aspx

Tang KHD. Movement control as an effective measure against Covid-19 spread in Malaysia: an overview. J Public Health (Berlin) [Internet]; 2020. Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-020-01316-w

Tang KHD. A scoping review of studies on COVID-19. Int J Sci & Healthcare Res. 2020;5(2):205–14.