Modelling Students’ Preferences for Mobile Telecommunication Plans: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Archives of Current Research International,
Aims: We employed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to investigate students’ preferences for mobile telecommunication plans in a South African University.
Study design: Locally optimal DCE were constructed for our choice sets using readily available ideas from blocked fractional factorial designs. This is in contrast to other approaches that may be more complex practically especially when the number of attributes is large.
Place and duration of study: The study was conducted in August 2017 at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Edgewood Campus, Pinetown, South Africa.
Methodology: Four hypothetical mobile telecommunication companies were considered and the selected attributes were call rate, data speed, customer service, premiums and network coverage. A two-stage sampling technique was used to select 180 respondents from the student population and data were collected via face-to-face interview. A blocked fractional factorial design in blocks each of size four was used to generate the choice sets used to obtain information from the respondents. An extra choice set was included to ascertain the consistency of the choices. Proportion of rational respondents was computed. Multinomial logit model was used to analyze the data and marginal willingness to pay estimates was obtained for the attributes.
Results: The proportion of “rational” respondents was 74%. At 0.1% level of significance, the students valued all the attributes except data speed in the process of choosing a particular mobile network. Furthermore, marginal willingness to pay estimates showed that students preferred to pay 51 cents more per minute to have very good customer service. They also preferred to pay extra 13 and 45 cents per minute for more premiums and better network coverage respectively.
Conclusion: The results provide empirical evidence of what students perceive as the most important factors influencing their choice of mobile network service providers and these may have decision-making implications for South African-based telecommunication companies.
- Discrete choice experiment
- mobile telecommunication plans
- students’ preferences
- blocked fractional factorial design
- willingness to pay
How to Cite
Olatokun W, Nwonne S. Determinants of users’ choice of mobile service providers in the Nigerian telecommunications market. Afr. J. Comp. & ICT. 2012;5(4):19-32.
Dagli O, Jenkins GP. Consumer Preferences for Improvements in Mobile Telecommunication Services. Telemat. Inform. 2016;33:205-16.
Confraria J, Ribeiro T, Vasconcelos H. Analysis of consumer preferences for mobile telecom plans using a discrete choice experiment. Telecomm. Policy. 2017;41(3):157-69.
Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
Elshiewy O, Guhl D, Boztuğ Y. Multinomial logit models in marketing – from fundamentals to state-of-the-art. ZFP Journal of Research and Management. 2017;39(3): 32-49.
Tetteh EK, Morris S, Titcheneker-Hooker N. Discrete-choice modelling of patient preferences for modes of drug administration. Health Econ. Rev. 2017;7:26.
Tarfasa S, Balana BB, Tefera T, Woldeamanuel T, Moges A, Dinato M. et al. Modeling smallholder farmers' preferences for soil management measures: A case study from South Ethiopia. Ecol. Econ. 2018; 145: 410- 19.
Oyinbo O, Chamberlin J, Vanlauwe B, Vrankena L, Kamarad YA, Craufurd P. et al. Farmers' preferences for high-input agriculture supported by site-specific extension services: Evidence from a choice experiment in Nigeria. Agric. Syst. 2019; 173: 12-26.
Konig A, Grippenkoven J. Modelling travellers’ appraisal of ridepooling service characteristics with a discrete choice experiment. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev.2020;12(1):1-11.
Jonker M, de Bekker-Grob E, Veldwijk J, Goossens L, Bour S, Rutten-Van Mölken M. COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment. JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH. 2020; 8(10): e20741.
Uys, W., Mia, A., Jansen, GJ., Van der Schyff, H., Josias, MA., Khusu, M. et al. Smartphone application usage amongst students at a South African University. Proceedings of IST-Africa Conference, Cunningham P, Cunningham M, editors. 2012; 1-11.
Accessed 13 March 2021
Kuzmanovic M, Radosavljevic M, Vujosevic M. Understanding student preferences for postpaid mobile services using conjoint analysis. Acta Polytech. 2013;10(1):159-76.
North D, Johnston K, Ophoff J. The Use of Mobile Phones by South African University Students. Issues informing sci. inf. Technol. 2014; 115-38. Accessed 13 March 2021.
Hailat S, Hailat M. Mobile phone use for academic and social purposes among Social Studies students in the University System in Jordan. JHETP. 2015; 15(5): 80-90.
Kelly T, Rossotto CM, editors. Broadband strategies handbook. The World Bank; 2012.
Zeithaml VA, Bitner MJ. Services marketing: Integrating customer focus across the firm. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw- Hill; 2003.
Newman MEJ. Networks: An introduction. Oxford University Press; 2010.
Jaynes J, Wong WK, Xu H. (2016). Using blocked fractional factorial designs to construct discrete choice experiments for healthcare studies. Stat. Med. 2016; 35: 2543-60.
Stinson DR. Combinatorial designs: Constructions and Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
Dinitz JH, Froncek D, Lamken ER, Wallis WD. Scheduling a Tournament. In: Colbourn CJ, Dinitz JH, editors. Handbook of Combinatorial Designs. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2007.
Alawode OA, Amahia GN. Training schedules for sixteen Ayo players using some Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. Science Focus. 2008;13(2):56- 69.
Accessed 4 November 2020. Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318722019_Training_Schedules_for_Sixteen_Ayo_Players_Using_some_Balanced_Incomplete_Block_Designs#fullTextFileContent.
Otekunrin OA, Emehinola P. Result Computation for University of Ibadan Statistics Department using Anonymous Threshold Scheme. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computing Research and Innovations (CoRI’16), Ibadan, Nigeria, 7th – 9th September, 2016; 177-180. Accessed 13 March 2021.
Jaynes J, Ding X, Xu H, Wong WK, Ho CM. An application of fractional factorial designs to study drug combinations. Stat. Med. 2013; 32(2): 307-18.
El-Taweel TA, Haridy S. An application of fractional factorial design in wire electrochemical turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2014; 75:1207–18.
Green PE. On the design of choice experiments involving multifactor alternatives. J. Consum. Res. 1974; 1(2): 61–68.
Wu CFJ, Hamada MS. Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
Chen H, Cheng CS. Theory of optimal blocking of 2^(n-m) designs. Ann. Stat. 1999;27(6):1948-73.
Jaynes J, Xu H, Wong, WK. Minimum aberration designs for discrete choice experiments. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 2017; 11:339-60.
Burgess L, Street DJ, Wasi N. Comparing designs for choice experiments: a case study. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 2011; 5(1): 25–46.
Burgess L, Knox SA, Street DJ, Norman R. Comparing designs constructed with and without priors for choice experiments: A case study. J. Stat. Theory Pract. 2015; 9: 330-60.
Statistics South Africa. South African Community Survey 2016. Indicators derived from the full population Community Survey. Accessed 13 March 2021.
Orme B. Interpreting the results of conjoint analysis, getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison, Wis Research Publishers LLC; 2010.
Thurstone L. A law of comparative judgement. Psychol. Rev. 1927; 34(4): 273-86.
McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour, In: Zarembka P. editor. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974.
Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making. A User’s Guide. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008; 26(8): 661-77.
Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Rolfe J, Bennett J, Louviere J. Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation. Ecol. Econ. 2000; 35(2): 289–302.
Toperesu BA, van Belle JP, Turpin M. Impacts and Satisfaction of Using Smartphones for Learning in a University Context. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on the Internet, Cyber Security and Information Systems 2019;12:357- 71.
Rahman S, Haque A, Ahmad MIS. Exploring influencing factors for the selection of mobile phone service providers: A structural equational modeling (SEM) approach on Malaysian consumers. AJBM. 2010; 4(13):2885-98.
Deloitte. Global Mobile Consumer Survey 2017. The South African Cut. Accessed 24 March 2021.
Available:https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/za/Documents/technology-media telecommunications/ZA-Deloitte-South-Africa-Mobile-Consumer-Survey-2017 Desktop_090718.pdf
Abstract View: 41 times
PDF Download: 23 times