Evaluation of Compressive Strength in Various Timbers for Agricultural Implements in Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India

Annu Rani *

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Jayant Singh

Govind Ballabh Pant Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.

T.P. Singh

Govind Ballabh Pant Agriculture and Technology, Pant Nagar, Uttarakhand, India.

Ajit Kumar

Teerthanker Mahaveer University, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary

Sri Karan Narendra Agriculture University, Jobner, Rajasthan, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

This study investigates the compressive strength of various timber types, including Red Cedar, Java Plum, Mango, Yellow Teak, Margosa, Eucalyptus, Teak, North Indian Rose timber, Lebbeck, and Sal. The compressive strengths of these timbers were measured to be 43.79, 50.42, 78.00, 71.16, 68.32, 69.88, 80.78, 85.50, 65.12, and 81.20 MPa, respectively. North Indian Rose timber and Sal exhibited the highest compressive strengths, suggesting their superior suitability for applications requiring high compressive resistance. Conversely, Red Cedar showed the lowest compressive strength among the timbers tested. The standard deviations for these measurements were Java Plum (0.07), Mango (0.28), Yellow Teak (0.36), Teak (0.45), Margosa (0.52), Eucalyptus (6.11), Red Cedar (0.69), North Indian Rose timber (0.79), Lebbeck (0.93), and Sal (0.68), with Mango displaying the lowest variation. The findings indicate that North Indian Rose timber and Sal are particularly robust, while Mango exhibits consistent compressive strength, making these timbers preferable for specific structural applications.

Keywords: Compressive strength, material properties, standard deviation, timber performance, high compressive resistance


How to Cite

Annu Rani, Jayant Singh, T.P. Singh, Ajit Kumar, and Mukesh Kumar Choudhary. 2024. “Evaluation of Compressive Strength in Various Timbers for Agricultural Implements in Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India”. Archives of Current Research International 24 (5):785–791. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2024/v24i5754.