The Application of Nanotechnology in Various Food Categories and Packaging
Khushboo Gupta
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Mohd Ashaq *
Govt Degree College Thannamandi, District Rajouri, Jammu and Kashmir -185212, India.
Rohit Sharma
RARS Rajouri, SKUAST, Jammu, India.
Anirban Dutta
Department of Agronomy, Assam Agricultural University, India.
Narinder Panotra
Institute of biotechnology, SKUAST, Jammu, India.
Gyanendra Singh
Department of Agriculture, Motherhood University, Roorkee, Haridwar, Uttrakhand, India.
Rajan singh-YP
Indian institute of vegetable research, Varanasi, India.
Shivam Kumar Pandey
Rashtriya Raksha University, India.
Michelle C. Lallawmkimi
Department of Agriculture, Government of Mizoram, Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Kolasib, Mizoram, India.
Bal Veer Singh
Department of Agronomy, CSA University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, U. P.-208002, India.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has the potential to revolutionize the food industry by enhancing safety, quality, and shelf life. However, public acceptance is crucial for successful commercialization. This study provides a comparative analysis of consumer perceptions, attitudes, and willingness to purchase nanotechnology-based products across various food categories (processed foods, beverages, dairy, meat, fresh produce) and packaging applications (active, intelligent, biodegradable). Findings indicate that acceptance varies significantly based on food category and packaging type. Key influencing factors include perceived risks/benefits, knowledge/awareness, trust in regulations, and sociocultural/demographic variables. The study emphasizes the need for effective risk communication, transparent labeling, and public engagement to enhance consumer trust. Insights can guide policymakers, researchers, and industry in developing targeted strategies to address concerns and promote responsible nanotechnology development in the food sector.
Keywords: Nanotechnology, food industry, public acceptance, consumer perceptions, risk communication